Ambience Infrastructure (P) Ltd. v. Ambience Island Apartment Owners, (2021) 2 SCC 163

Home
/
Publications
/
Case Snippets
/
Ambience Infrastructure (P)...

The Supreme Court held that the execution proceedings and original proceedings are separate and independent. An appeal under S. 23 of the Consumer Protection Act will not lie to Supreme Court against an order which has been passed in the course of execution proceedings. An appeal under S. 23 is maintainable against an order which has been passed by NCDRG on a complaint where the value of goods or services and compensation, if any, claimed, exceeds the threshold which is prescribed. Hence the appeal under S. 23 of the CP Act against the order in execution dismissed as being non-maintainable.

Let us help you!

If you need any help, please feel free to contact us. We will get back to you within one business day. Alternatively, if you're in a hurry, you can call us now

+91 9052538538
info@karavadi.in

Recent Case Snippets

Jaishri Laxmanrao Patil v. Chief Minister, Maharashtra, SLP (C) 15737/2019, Judgment date: 05-05-2021

The classification of Marathas as a socially and educationally backward class was unreasonable as they belonged to a politically dominant caste with significant economic resources. The court also… Read more »

The Exorbitant Price of Justice: Assessing Security Deposits in Arbitration Appeals under the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996

Introduction: The Rationale Behind the 2015 Amendments The 2015 amendments to the Arbitration and Conciliation Act aimed to revolutionize the arbitration process in India, focusing on enhancing time… Read more »

K. Shanthamma Vs. State of Telangana, (2022) 4 SCC 574

That the proof of 'demand of bribe' by a public servant and its acceptance by him is sine qua non for establishing the offence of bribe taking, coming… Read more »