Supreme Court Upholds Fundamental Right to Be Informed of Arrest Grounds

  1. Home
  2. /
  3. Publications
  4. /
  5. Case Snippets
  6. /
  7. Supreme Court Upholds...

In Vihaan Kumar v. State of Haryana (2025), the Supreme Court held informing grounds of arrest to relative of accused is not sufficient and that Article 22(1) mandates that every arrested person must be informed about the grounds of arrest in a way they understand. The court declared the Appellant’s arrest was illegal due to non-compliance with Article 22(1). The Court ordered the release of Appellant immediate and quashed all subsequent remand orders. The Appellant Vihaan Kumar, arrested for alleged economic offences, argued that he was never informed of the grounds for his arrest. The police admitted that they had conveyed the reasons, but only to the wife of the Accused and not to him.

Further, it was categorically held that such intimation would ensure access to legal remedies and safeguard liberty under Article 21. Further, it was categorically held that such intimation would ensure access to legal remedies and safeguard liberty under Article 21. Thereby, the Hon’ble Supreme Court had held and affirmed that arresting anyone without intimating the reasons for such arrest would be considered an illegal arrest. Additionally, the Court, while taking note of the inhumane act of handcuffing Kumar to a hospital bed, and condemned it and held such an act to be violative of his dignity

Let us help you!

If you need any help, please feel free to contact us. We will get back to you within one business day. Alternatively, if you're in a hurry, you can call us now

+91 9052538538
info@karavadi.in

Recent Case Snippets

Leader of Opposition: Democratic Necessity or Speaker’s Discretion?

“Opposition in a democratic House is a great necessity. It is an indispensable condition of all democratic institutions. We propose to all ourselves, and we propose to make… Read more »

PRITHVI RAJ CHAUHAN Vs. UOI – (2020) 4 SCC 727

Section 18A - SC/ST Act, 1989 - Constitutional Validity - The Apex Court, observed that provisions of Section 438 Cr.PC shall not apply to the cases under Act.… Read more »

State Project Director, Up Education for All Project Board & Ors. Vs. Saroj Maurya & Ors., Civil Appeal No. 3465 OF 2023

The Hon’ble Supreme Court while dealing with an SLP set aside the judgment and remanded a matter back to the Division Bench of Hon’ble Allahabad High Court for… Read more »

Disclaimer

The Rules and Regulations set forth by the Bar Council of India under Advocates Act, 1961 prohibit Advocates or Law Firms from advertising or soliciting work through public domain communications. This website is intended solely to provide information. Karavadi & Associates (“K&A”) does not aim to advertise or solicit clients through this platform. K & A disclaim any responsibility for decisions made by readers/visitors based solely on the content of this website.

By clicking 'AGREE,' readers/visitors agree and acknowledge that the information provided herein (a) does not constitute advertising or solicitation, and (b) is intended solely for their understanding of K & A services. By continuing to use this site, you consent to the use of cookies on your device as outlined in our Cookie Policy.